Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264850›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Prediction of hallucinogen persisting perception disorder and thought disturbance symptoms following psychedelic use.

Katie Zhou, David de Wied, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Hannes Kettner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ten practical suggestions for setting up a psychedelic study.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie ZhouCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-9979
David de WiedCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2915-6105
Robin L Carhart-HarrisCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Hannes KettnerCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in using psychedelic drugs to treat psychiatric disorders is growing rapidly. While modern controlled clinical trials show a favorable safety and efficacy profile, it remains unclear if the risk of side effects would increase with broader use in more heterogeneous populations. To address this, we investigated the frequency and baseline predictors of delusional ideation, magical thinking, and "hallucinogen persisting perception disorder" (HPPD)-related symptoms following psychedelic use in a self-selected naturalistic sample. Using a prospective cohort study, symptoms were assessed in (

Indexed as

adverse effectsdelusional ideationHPPDmagical thinkingpsychedelics

Identifiers

PMID40264850
PMCPMC12012689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.