Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264826›Full record

ArticleCosmetics2024

AI Dermatochroma Analytica (AIDA): Smart Technology for Robust Skin Color Classification and Segmentation.

Abderrachid Hamrani, Daniela Leizaola, Nikhil Kumar Reddy Vedere, Robert S Kirsner, Kacie Kaile, Alexander Lee Trinidad, Anuradha Godavarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cosmetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abderrachid HamraniDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0295-855X
Daniela LeizaolaOptical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 2675, Miami, FL 33174, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8416-7560
Nikhil Kumar Reddy VedereOptical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 2675, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Robert S KirsnerDepartment of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Kacie KaileOptical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 2675, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Alexander Lee TrinidadOptical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 2675, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Anuradha GodavartyOptical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 2675, Miami, FL 33174, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6094-5909

Funding

Smartphone-based optical scanner to physiologically assess diabetic foot ulcersR01EB033413 · NIBIB · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI GODAVARTY, ANURADHA · 2022 to 2025
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB033413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional methods for skin color classification, such as visual assessments and conventional image classification, face limitations in accuracy and consistency under varying conditions. To address this, we developed AI Dermatochroma Analytica (AIDA), an unsupervised learning system designed to enhance dermatological diagnostics. AIDA applies clustering techniques to classify skin tones without relying on labeled data, evaluating over twelve models, including K-means, density-based, hierarchical, and fuzzy logic algorithms. The model's key feature is its ability to mimic the process clinicians traditionally perform by visually matching the skin with the Fitzpatrick Skin Type (FST) palette scale but with enhanced precision and accuracy using Euclidean distance-based clustering techniques. AIDA demonstrated superior performance, achieving a 97% accuracy rate compared to 87% for a supervised convolutional neural network (CNN). The system also segments skin images into clusters based on color similarity, providing detailed spatial mapping aligned with dermatological standards. This segmentation reduces the uncertainty related to lighting conditions and other environmental factors, enhancing precision and consistency in skin color classification. This approach offers significant improvements in personalized dermatological care by reducing reliance on labeled data, improving diagnostic accuracy, and paving the way for future applications in diverse dermatological and cosmetic contexts.

Indexed as

machine learning unsupervised clusteringskin color classification

Identifiers

PMID40264826
PMCPMC12014195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.