ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Changing lanes: extending CAR T-cell therapy to high-risk plasma cell dyscrasias.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in multiple myeloma treatment: Integrating quadruplet and dual antigen CAR-T therapy.iScience · 2026Review
- CD30+ T-cell lymphoma following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy (CART-cell therapy): Diagnostic uncertainty in a postimmunotherapy setting.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- CAR-T cell therapy in nephrology.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Amyloid Light Chain Proteins in Cardiovascular Disease: Pathogenesis and Emerging Therapies for Cardiac Amyloidosis.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- Plasma Cell Leukemia Update on Immunophenotype, Molecular Characteristics, and Therapy. The Second Part of Plasma Cell Neoplasms with Spreading in the Blood and Tissues.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) cellular therapies have advanced outcomes in challenging hematologic malignancies like leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Plasma cell-directed CAR T-cell therapies have been particularly beneficial in multiple myeloma, suggesting that these agents may have a role in other challenging plasma cell disorders such as systemic AL amyloidosis and plasma cell leukemia. AL amyloidosis is a monoclonal plasma cell disorder resulting in the deposition of protein fibrils that compromise end-organ function. Delays in diagnosis can result in end-organ dysfunction and organ failure, making designing and completing treatment difficult. Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and highly challenging malignancy with dismal survival outcomes despite aggressive therapy. Both diagnoses are currently treated with regimens borrowed from myeloma: a combination of novel agents and chemotherapy induction, then autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), with the current practice trending towards consolidation and maintenance. Unfortunately, only 20% of AL amyloidosis patients are transplant-eligible at diagnosis. Those transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients are treated with combination induction chemotherapy, which may be limited by worsening disease-related end-organ dysfunction. Plasma cell leukemia patients are still very likely to relapse after this intensive and prolonged therapy. Despite the promise of a shorter course of therapy, CAR T-cell therapies directed against plasma cells have not been rigorously investigated in patients with AL amyloidosis or PCL; most trials of MM have excluded these patients. Herein, we describe current treatment paradigms for AL amyloidosis and PCL and review the evidence for CAR T-cell therapies in these challenging plasma cell disorders. Further investigation into CAR T-cell therapies for plasma cell disorders other than multiple myeloma is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.