ArticleInterspeech2024
Comparing ambulatory voice measures during daily life with brief laboratory assessments in speakers with and without vocal hyperfunction.
Article in Interspeech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most common types of voice disorders are associated with hyperfunctional voice use in daily life. Although current clinical practice uses measures from brief laboratory recordings to assess vocal function, it is unclear how these relate to an individual's habitual voice use. The purpose of this study was to quantify the correlation and offset between voice features computed from laboratory and ambulatory recordings in speakers with and without vocal hyperfunction. Features derived from a neck-surface accelerometer included estimates of sound pressure level, fundamental frequency, cepstral peak prominence, and spectral tilt. Whereas some measures from laboratory recordings correlated significantly with those captured during daily life, only approximately 6-52% of the actual variance was accounted for. Thus, brief voice assessments are quite limited in the extent to which they can accurately characterize the daily voice use of speakers with and without vocal hyperfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.