ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Telehealth payment parity and outpatient service utilization: evidence from privately insured workers.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital and Remote Health for Older Adults in Rural or Underserved Settings: Systematic Review of Clinical, Behavioral, and Implementation Outcomes.JMIR aging · 2026Pooled it
- Mental health care access in rural communities amid the expansion of telehealth.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Does Paying the Same Sustain Telehealth? A Systematic Review of Payment Parity Laws.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging Distance, Delivering Care: Pediatric Tele-Nutrition in the Digital Health Era-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Consumer Preferences for Care Delivery Modality, Timely Care Access, and Time Costs: Insights from Discrete Choice Experiments.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- The state of digital health adoption in Nevada: A narrative review of infrastructure, policy, and health equity.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telehealth was catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic and has become a new norm in healthcare. In response to the pandemic, some states passed telehealth payment parity legislation, mandating equal payment rates for telehealth and in-person services. We evaluated the relationship between telehealth payment parity and health service utilization, focusing on insured workers in commercial insurance plans. Using the Merative Commercial Claims and Encounters database from 2019 to 2021, we leverage variation in the timing of policy changes across states using a difference-in-difference approach. Payment parity was significantly associated with increased telehealth visits and total outpatient visits but without a notable rise in in-person visits. Furthermore, payment parity was pronounced in increasing telehealth utilization within self-funded large employer plans, while not significantly associated with telehealth visits among fully insured small employer plans. Our findings underscore the important role of payment parity in increasing telehealth service utilization by incentivizing providers. Future policies should support the sustainable integration of telehealth services, shifting from solely focusing on equal payment rates to adopting value-based reimbursement models that improve equitable healthcare access for all employees in commercial insurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.