Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264683›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Exploring the latent space of transcriptomic data with topic modeling.

Filippo Valle, Michele Caselle, Matteo Osella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippo VallePhysics Department, University of Turin and INFN, Via Pietro Giuria 1, 12125 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-8667
Michele CasellePhysics Department, University of Turin and INFN, Via Pietro Giuria 1, 12125 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-142X
Matteo OsellaPhysics Department, University of Turin and INFN, Via Pietro Giuria 1, 12125 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-5434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of high-dimensional transcriptomic datasets is increasing at a tremendous pace, together with the need for suitable computational tools. Clustering and dimensionality reduction methods are popular go-to methods to identify basic structures in these datasets. At the same time, different topic modeling techniques have been developed to organize the deluge of available data of natural language using their latent topical structure. This paper leverages the statistical analogies between text and transcriptomic datasets to compare different topic modeling methods when applied to gene expression data. Specifically, we test their accuracy in the specific task of discovering and reconstructing the tissue structure of the human transcriptome and distinguishing healthy from cancerous tissues. We examine the properties of the latent space recovered by different methods, highlight their differences, and their pros and cons across different tasks. We focus in particular on how different statistical priors can affect the results and their interpretability. Finally, we show that the latent topic space can be a useful low-dimensional embedding space, where a basic neural network classifier can annotate transcriptomic profiles with high accuracy.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeCluster AnalysisHumansNeoplasmsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40264683
PMCPMC12012681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.