ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
Exploring the latent space of transcriptomic data with topic modeling.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel cancer subtyping method guided by tumor-normal sample in latent space of transcriptomic variational autoencoder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of high-dimensional transcriptomic datasets is increasing at a tremendous pace, together with the need for suitable computational tools. Clustering and dimensionality reduction methods are popular go-to methods to identify basic structures in these datasets. At the same time, different topic modeling techniques have been developed to organize the deluge of available data of natural language using their latent topical structure. This paper leverages the statistical analogies between text and transcriptomic datasets to compare different topic modeling methods when applied to gene expression data. Specifically, we test their accuracy in the specific task of discovering and reconstructing the tissue structure of the human transcriptome and distinguishing healthy from cancerous tissues. We examine the properties of the latent space recovered by different methods, highlight their differences, and their pros and cons across different tasks. We focus in particular on how different statistical priors can affect the results and their interpretability. Finally, we show that the latent topic space can be a useful low-dimensional embedding space, where a basic neural network classifier can annotate transcriptomic profiles with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.