Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264656›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in urology2024

On variability and detecting unreliable measurements in animal cystometry.

Zachary C Danziger, Daniel Jaskowak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary C DanzigerEmory University, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine - Division of Physical Therapy, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Daniel JaskowakFlorida International University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Miami, FL, United States.

Funding

A new hybrid modeling framework combining biophysics and deep learning to predict and optimize peripheral neuromodulation outcomes in lower urinary tract diseaseR01DK133605 · NIDDK · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Zachary C Danziger · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK133605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Animal cystometry, a process of infusing fluid into the urinary bladder to evoke reflex contractions, is a common way to study the effects of pathology, injury, or experimental therapy on lower urinary tract (LUT) dynamics. By monitoring fluid movement during the cystometric micturition cycle, one can compute important quantities that indicate the health and function of the LUT, such as bladder capacity and voiding efficiency. Unfortunately, volume measurements in these difficult studies are often unpreventably corrupted by noise, leading to uncertainty when estimating key cystometric parameters. Methods: This work proposes a criterion, based on measurable quantities, that flags micturition cycles in cystometry studies that are likely to contain large measurement errors, potentially allowing experimenters to remove them from analysis to obtain a more accurate summary of LUT dynamics. Results: We describe the criterion, validate it against experimental data, and use computer simulations to demonstrate its utility.

Indexed as

animal cystometrycystometry simulationlower urinary tract (LUT)measurement reliabilityurodynamic assessmenturodynamic simulation

Identifiers

PMID40264656
PMCPMC12014196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.