Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264642›Full record

ArticleCreativity research journal2025

A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies.

Eva Specker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Creativity research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eva SpeckerUniversity of Vienna.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their "natural habitat," i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.

Indexed as

ecological validityempirical aestheticseveryday aestheticsmethodologypsychology of art

Identifiers

PMID40264642
PMCPMC12012670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.