ArticleCureus2025
Awareness and Perception of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Among Pain Specialists: A Questionnaire-Based Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to explore the perceptions and clinical approaches of pain management specialists toward myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a condition characterized by persistent fatigue, widespread pain, unrefreshing sleep, and autonomic dysfunction. Given the challenges in diagnosis and management, pain specialists may play a pivotal role in symptom relief. By identifying variations in evaluation and treatment practices, this study seeks to enhance the recognition of ME/CFS and improve its clinical management within pain medicine. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe questionnaire was distributed in printed form to 250 pain specialists in Turkey. Given the limited number of pain physicians in the country, the study aimed to encompass all actively practicing specialists. The survey included four demographic questions, eight true-false questions, 12 multiple-choice questions, and four rating-scale questions. Data were collected anonymously. Data were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 27.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), with descriptive statistics and chi-square (χ²) tests applied to examine the relationships between awareness levels and attitudinal variables.
resultsIn Turkey, 106 pain medicine physicians (42.4%) participated in the study. The average age was 40.6±8.52 years. Among the participants, 39.6% had previously heard of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Physicians were inclined to first ask the question, "Do you think you get enough sleep at night?" when evaluating these patients, with a rate of 63.2%. The majority of participants (65.9%) stated that they "occasionally" or "rarely" considered the relationship between fatigue and orthostatic intolerance. Additionally, 37.7% believed that this disease is a subtype of depression. The statement, "chronic fatigue decreases with intense aerobic exercise," was agreed upon by 50.9% of participants. This controversial statement was particularly more common among those who were unaware of ME/CFS's alternative name (p=0.009) and those who did not take dysautonomic disorders into account (p=0.048). When considering an ME/CFS diagnosis, physicians most frequently referred patients to the physical medicine and rehabilitation department (32.1%). Those who preferred not to refer patients to any department (12.3%) tended to find it appropriate for a patient to seek consultation at a pain medicine clinic due to widespread body pain and fatigue (χ2=11.405, p=0.044).
conclusionThis study is the first questionnaire-based research assessing pain physicians' awareness and attitudes toward ME/CFS. By highlighting their perspectives on its evaluation and management, our findings may improve recognition and clinical approaches to ME/CFS. Future research should focus on education and standardized guidelines to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.