Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264621›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Comparative Study of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Obese and Non-obese Iraqi Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Section.

Salah F Abdulnabi, Mostafa Mohammadi, Ali Jabbari, Somayeh Ghorbani, Omid Nikpayam, Hamed A Flaifel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salah F AbdulnabiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IRN.
Mostafa MohammadiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Ali JabbariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IRN.
Somayeh GhorbaniDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IRN.
Omid NikpayamDepartment of Nutrition, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, IRN.
Hamed A FlaifelDepartment of Anesthesia Technologies, Alfarqadein University College, Basra, IRQ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity has become a global health concern, and it is on the rise in developed nations among both the general and the obstetric populations. To know if a person has obesity or normal body weight, the body mass index (BMI) is now widely used and regarded as a trustworthy indicator.

aimThis study was designed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between obese and non-obese pregnant women who underwent cesarean section (C/S) in Basra city in the south of Iraq.

methodThis comparative observational cross-sectional study was done in Basra Teaching Hospital, Basra, Iraq, from May 10, 2024, to November 10, 2024, on 206 pregnant women aged between 15 and 50 years old who underwent C/S delivery. The participants were subdivided into three groups according to their BMI: group one: normal weight (n = 64) with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m², group two: overweight (n = 79) with a BMI of 25-29.9 kg/m², and group three: obese (n = 63) with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m². A study of their preoperative data, including age, blood pressure, BMI, educational level, occupation, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), previous abortion, previous stillbirth, parity, number of previous C/S, and gestational age, and correlations with their postoperative findings; postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), the time of initial mobility from bed after surgery, the time of starting breastfeeding, the time of starting intestinal sounds, macrosomia, and admission of neonates to the intensive care unit (NICU) was recorded, analyzed, and compared for all three groups. The statistical significance level is considered the p-value < 0.05.

resultsThe results demonstrated a clear correlation between maternal and neonatal complications following C/Ss and increased BMI. High BMI was substantially related to maternal factors that differed considerably across the groups, including education level (p-value = 0.001), parity (p-value ≤ 0.001), and the number of previous C/S (p-value = 0.011). Prenatal problems such as GDM (p-value = 0.042) and gestational hypertension (p-value = 0.016) also showed a significant difference, with the obese group experiencing greater rates than the overweight and normal groups. The results showed that there was a significant difference related to maternal postoperative outcomes like the initial time of returning intestinal sounds (p-value = 0.026), the initial time of starting mobility (p-value ≤ 0.001), and the initial time of starting breastfeeding (p-value ≤ 0.001), as well as neonatal postoperative outcomes like macrosomia (p-value = 0.030) and neonatal admission to the NICU (p-value = 0.001); they were also higher in the obese group. Also, the obese group has a longer duration of surgery (p-value ≤ 0.001) and hospital stay (p-value ≤ 0.001) than the other groups. The results showed a non-significant difference regarding PPH among the study groups.

conclusionThe study concluded that obesity has adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes for mothers and their infants. A low educational level is associated with high BMI, leading to high risks of postoperative complications. Gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension are more frequent in obese women. Obese women should be considered high-risk and recommended to maintain weight to reduce any complications after surgery.

Indexed as

cesarean sectionmaternal outcomesneonatal outcomesobesitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40264621
PMCPMC12014165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.