ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Effect of
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess whether Methods: In this study, 11 and 10 neonates in experimental and control groups were recruited, respectively (upon the follow-up of experimental groups at 7-14 days after discharge, stool frequency was decreased commonly. Therefore, this study was prematurely terminated). After 12 h of phototherapy, researchers recorded clinical information and measured transcutaneous bilirubin (TCB). Fresh fecal samples were collected at seven specific time points: before phototherapy (A), after 12 (B), 24 (C) and 36 h (D) of phototherapy, as well as 10 (D10), 20 (D20) and 30 days (D30) after delivery. Results: A tendency toward fewer blue light sessions and shorter time of hospitalization was shown in experimental groups, but this exhibited no statistical significance ( Conclusion: Clinical trial register: It was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No.: ChiCTR2000036013).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.