ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Construction of Fracture Liaison Service Scheme Under Medical Alliance Framework in China: A Modified Delphi Method Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body roundness index as a predictor of 3-month readmission in elderly patients with first-episode acute heart failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Benefits of Medical Group Construction for Healthcare Professionals: A Survey of Six Tightly Knit Pilot Urban Medical Groups.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To devise an implementation blueprint for the fracture liaison service (FLS) model within the context of a medical consortium. The FLS is an integrated system designed to identify, register, assess, treat, and monitor patients with osteoporotic fractures. The FLS constitutes a structured intervention strategy to administer standardized care to osteoporotic fracture patients. Its efficacy has been validated through extensive implementation across various countries. However, large-scale intervention research on this model within China is lacking. This investigation endeavors to construct a comprehensive FLS framework and to establish its core performance indicators within the Chinese medical alliance structure. Patients and Methods: The research methodology encompassed focus group interviews and a two-phase Delphi process. An initial inventory of FLS implementation elements was compiled through a systematic literature review and focus group discussions. This was followed by a two-step Delphi survey, wherein experts refined the key indicators. The study calculated metrics such as response rate, composite reliability (CR), coefficient of variation, and the Kendall coefficient of concordance to evaluate the indicators. Results: The study involved 17 experts who completed 2 rounds of the Delphi consultation, culminating in a consensus on 2 primary and 8 secondary indicators, encompassing 34 specific indicators. The response rate for the first and second round was 100%, with CR values of 0.871 and 0.882, and Kendall's coefficients of 0.161 and 0.179, respectively ( Conclusion: This work delineated a robust set of indicators specifically tailored for the FLS schema under the medical alliance framework in China. The rigorous application of the Delphi technique led to a consensus on 34 pivotal indicators, elucidating their relative significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.