ArticlePlant direct2025
A Periodic 4-h Extension of the Dark Period Did Not Cause Long-Term Changes in the Circadian Regulation of Photosynthesis and Sugar Levels in Lettuces.
Article in Plant direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The photoperiod in controlled environment agriculture can be adjusted to minimize electricity consumption, even if it differs from the plant's circadian rhythm. Daily modifications of the photoperiod disrupt the plant's circadian resonance state, resulting in altered growth and yield. However, the effects of periodic, rather than daily, photoperiod adjustments remain less understood. This study aims to investigate the effects of a 4-h extension of the dark period every 3 days on the circadian regulation of photosynthetic activity and sugar content, as well as on lettuce yield. Control lettuces were grown under a 16/8 photoperiod, while EPD lettuces ("Exceptionally long Period of Darkness") were grown under a repeated 16/12-16/8-16/8 photoperiod pattern from the beginning to the end of cultivation. The experiment was repeated twice, and the 4-h extension induced a loss of photosynthetic activity of 7% and 11% during the following lighting period in the first and second experiments, respectively. The yields were not affected. The stomatal conductance followed the circadian rhythm of lettuce rather than directly responding to photoperiod modifications. Furthermore, no long-term changes in starch and sucrose content were observed. Taken together, these results show that extending the dark period by 4 h every 3 days did not cause long-term disruption of the circadian regulation of photosynthesis and sugar levels in lettuce. These results provide new insights for optimizing light management in controlled environment agriculture, suggesting that the management of dark periods is crucial for maintaining yields and reducing energy consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.