ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Verbal De-Escalation and Implicit Bias Check Training for Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Recent scholarship has revealed racial disparities in emergency department (ED) physical restraint use in agitation management. We implemented an interdisciplinary educational program that integrates discussions about the role of bias in physical restraint use with workplace violence (WPV) prevention strategies to increase awareness of implicit bias and comfort with verbal de-escalation among ED staff. Patients and Methods: In partnership with hospital security at a large urban academic medical center, we developed a 1-hour online WPV prerequisite course followed by a 2-hour multi-modal, in-person training consisting of 40 minutes each of didactics, an interactive defensive skills workshop, and case-based simulations with structured debriefings. From September 2022 to June 2023, all patient-facing ED staff were invited to participate and received a $100 gift card for program completion. Participants rated their confidence and comfort in various aspects of agitation management on a 5-point Likert scale before and immediately after via pre- and post-training surveys. Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were employed for analysis. Results: Of 91 participants, 72 (79%) completed the pre- and post-training surveys. Representing a wide range of ED role groups, 74% of participants were clinical staff and a majority had 0-5 years of experience (65%). Among all participants, there was a statistically significant improvement in confidence and comfort with the various aspects of agitation management across all 11 questions (p<0.001). A similar change was observed among the clinical staff (p<0.001), however, the degree of improvement observed among those with greater than 5 years of experience was less dramatic than among clinical staff with 0-5 years of experience. Conclusion: Interdisciplinary multi-modal training can improve confidence and comfort with verbal de-escalation and implicit bias checks in team-based agitation management. Additional research is needed to understand if such integrated training can also reduce physical restraint use, racial disparities in restraint use, and WPV events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.