Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264470›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2025

Principal Component Analysis to Examine Fall-predictive Screening Tests for use during Locomotive Health Checkups.

Hiromi Matsumoto, Chika Tanimura, Hiroshi Hagino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiromi MatsumotoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Japan.
Chika TanimuraSchool of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Hiroshi HaginoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Sanin Rosai Hospital, Yonago, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine which components of screening tests are important for assessing locomotive dysfunction during locomotive health checkups and best predict falls in a prospective cohort study. Methods: Four hundred and sixty-eight residents were assessed for locomotive syndrome, frailty, knee and back pain, bone mass, muscle mass, grip strength, gait speed, gait variability, and kyphosis at a baseline locomotive health checkup. Residents were followed up after 1 year and surveyed about their incidence of falls. Results: A total of 379 residents were analyzed in the study. Principal component analysis was used to divide components using all screening tests for locomotive dysfunction. The primary variable making up the first principal component was "mobility function," the second was "muscle function," and the third was related to "spinal alignment." The tests that showed the highest principal component loadings in each component were the five-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale, muscle mass index, and kyphosis index. Binary regression analyses, adjusted for age and past fall history, showed that the five-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale was independently related with the incidence of falling (odds ratio=2.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-3.99). Conclusions: We propose that during a locomotive health checkup, mobility function, muscle function, and spinal alignment are important components for the assessment of locomotive dysfunction. Notably, the five-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale is a simple and convenient screening test that can predict the future incidence falls.

Indexed as

fallingfive-question geriatric locomotive function scalelocomotive dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40264470
PMCPMC12009670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.