Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264255›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2025

Investigating the Prevalence of Fungi in Diabetic Ulcers: An Under-Recognised Contributor to Polymicrobial Biofilms.

Jontana Allkja, Ahmed Bakri, Bryn Short, Andrew Gilmour, Jason L Brown, Abhijit M Bal, Kelly J M Newby, Toby Jenkins, Rob D Short, Craig Williams and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Survey of the Microbiome, Culturome and ARG Profile of a Cohort of Chronic Diabetic Foot Lesions.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jontana AllkjaSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Ahmed BakriSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Bryn ShortSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Andrew GilmourSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Jason L BrownSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Abhijit M BalMicrobiology Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Kelly J M NewbyPharmacy Department, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Toby JenkinsDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Rob D ShortDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Craig WilliamsMicrobiology Department, Lancaster Royal Infirmary, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK.
Gordon RamageSafeguarding Health Through Infection Prevention (SHIP) Research Group, Research Centre for Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0932-3514

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V005839/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common complications for diabetic patients, often exacerbated by complex polymicrobial biofilm infections. While the majority of DFU studies are bacterial focused, fungi have also been identified. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of fungi in DFUs, as well as their potential role and influence on persistence and wound healing. Consecutive DFU swabs were collected from 128 patients (n = 349). Fungal positivity was assessed using enhanced culture and real-time qPCR. Routine microbiology cultures were carried out as part of standard care in the clinics, and their results were then compared to our laboratory investigation. Routine and enhanced culture resulted in similar rates of fungal detection (~9%), whereas qPCR resulted in a higher rate of detection (31%). Notably, the predominant yeast Candida parapsilosis was present in ischaemic and penetrating bone wounds. These findings support existing evidence of fungal presence in DFUs. We demonstrated that routine diagnostic methods are sufficient for fungal detection, but enhanced culture methods allow for more precise fungal identification. Finally, while fungal presence does not appear to impact patient outcomes in our study, their role within these infections remains poorly understood, and further studies are needed to fully understand their relationship to the microbiome.

Indexed as

BiofilmsCoinfectionDiabetic FootFungiAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reactionchronic wounddiabetic foot ulcerfungi

Identifiers

PMID40264255
PMCPMC12015384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.