ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Biomechanical comparison of plate, intramedullary screw, and headless compression screw fixation in Danis-Weber type B lateral malleolar fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeber type B transsyndesmotic fractures are the most common type of lateral malleolar fractures, a common ankle fracture type. Although several surgical techniques are available for fixation, no clinical consensus exists regarding the optimal fixation method.
objectiveThis study evaluated the biomechanical differences in fixation stability among one-third tubular plates, 3.5-mm intramedullary screws, and 4.5-mm intramedullary headless compression screws for Weber type B lateral malleolar fractures using an in Vitro mechanical analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 24 artificial fibula bone specimens were used. The specimens were subjected to Weber type B lateral malleolar fractures using a saw blade and randomly divided into three groups treated with different fixation methods, with eight specimens per group: (1) One-third tubular plate, (2) 3.5-mm intramedullary screw, and (3) 4.5-mm intramedullary headless compression screw. The specimens were subjected to bending and torsional mechanical testing using a materials testing system. The bending test was evaluated using 10-mm displacement force (Newtons) and bending stiffness (Newtons/millimeter) as the assessment parameters. For the torsional test, 20° rotation torque (Newtons/millimeter) and torsional stiffness (Newton∙millimeters/degree) were used as evaluation parameters. The experimental results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. When significant differences were found, post hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Dunn-Bonferroni approach.
resultsIn the bending test, no statistical differences were observed between the three fixation methods, whether evaluated by 10-mm displacement force or bending stiffness. Nevertheless, for the 20° rotation torque assessment in the torsional test, both the one-third tubular plate (1360.31 ± 221.56 N·mm, median ± interquartile range) and the 4.5-mm intramedullary headless compression screw (1420.41 ± 281.95 N·mm) exhibited similar resistance, considerably outperforming the 3.5-mm intramedullary screw (605.80 ± 165.11 N·mm) in fracture fixation strength. In the torsional stiffness assessment, both the one-third tubular plate (67.67 ± 15.39 N·mm, median ± interquartile range) and the 4.5-mm intramedullary headless compression screw (62.44 ± 17.36 N·mm) exhibited equivalent resistance and were substantially superior to the 3.5-mm intramedullary screw (25.90 ± 5.1 N·mm) in their ability to fix fractures.
conclusionThe 4.5-mm intramedullary headless compression screw provides strong mechanical stability and a lower risk of soft tissue complications in clinical practice. Therefore, this headless compression screw can be recommended as a fixation option for Weber type B lateral malleolar fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.