ArticleCancer cell international2025
Integrating multi-cohort machine learning and clinical sample validation to explore peripheral blood mRNA diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of radiomics for detecting and characterising upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Integrative Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Analysis Identifies Novel Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable Machine Learning-Based Overall Survival Classification in Prostate Adenocarcinoma Using Integrated Clinical and Transcriptomic Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs in Prostate Cancer Liquid Biopsies: Early Detection, Prognosis, and Treatment Monitoring.Cells · 2026Review
- Article
- Integrated Multiomics Elucidates Molecular Mechanisms of Bisphenol A in Exacerbating Crohn's Disease.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of Oliceridine versus Sufentanil in postoperative analgesia for burn skin grafting: a machine learning and SHAP-based cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- ScRNA profiling of peripheral blood in kidney transplant recipients across rejection responses and treatments.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Unravelling TPX2-centered co-expression networks as key drivers of aggressive prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe global incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) has been rising annually, and early diagnosis and treatment remain pivotal for improving therapeutic outcomes and patient prognosis. Concurrently, advancements in liquid biopsy technology have facilitated disease diagnosis and monitoring, with its minimally invasive nature and low heterogeneity positioning it as a promising approach for predicting disease progression. However, current liquid biopsy strategies for PCa predominantly rely on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which lacks specificity and compromises diagnostic accuracy. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify novel liquid biopsy biomarkers to enable early and precise PCa diagnosis.
methodsWe integrated 12 machine learning algorithms to construct 113 combinatorial models, screening and validating an optimal PCa diagnostic panel across five datasets from TCGA and GEO databases. Subsequently, the biological feasibility of the selected predictive model was verified in one prostate epithelial cell line and five PCa cell lines. Robust RNA diagnostic targets were further validated for their expression in plasma samples to establish an RNA-based liquid biopsy strategy for PCa. Finally, plasma samples from PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients at Wuhan Tongji Hospital were collected to evaluate the strategy's clinical significance.
resultsDifferential analysis identified 1,071 candidate mRNAs, which were input into the integrated machine learning framework. Among the 113 combinatorial models, the 9-gene diagnostic panel selected by the Stepglm[both] and Enet[alpha = 0.4] algorithms demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy (mean AUC = 0.91), including JPH4, RASL12, AOX1, SLC18A2, PDZRN4, P2RY2, B3GNT8, KCNQ5, and APOBEC3C. Cell line experiments further validated AOX1 and B3GNT8 as robust RNA biomarkers, both exhibiting consistent PCa-specific expression in human plasma samples. In liquid biopsy analyses, AOX1 and B3GNT8 outperformed PSA in diagnostic accuracy, achieving a combined AUC of 0.91. Notably, these biomarkers also demonstrated diagnostic utility in patients with ISUP ≤ 2.
conclusionsThrough an integrated machine learning approach and clinical validation, we developed an RNA-based diagnostic panel for PCa. Specifically, we identified AOX1 and B3GNT8 as novel liquid biopsy biomarkers with promising clinical diagnostic value. These findings provide new targets and insights for early and precise PCa diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.