ArticleMobile DNA2025
Structural features of somatic and germline retrotransposition events in humans.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Human Transposable Elements: Long-Read Sequencing Technologies, Computational Analysis, and Implications for Human Disease.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Quantitative Control of Transposable Elements: From Genome Plasticity to Immune Regulatory Circuits.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Review
- Nanopore sequencing reveals hidden landscape of short L1 transductions in colorectal cancer.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Transposons disrupt genomic stability and trigger cancers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransposons are DNA sequences able to move or copy themselves to other genomic locations leading to insertional mutagenesis. Although transposon-derived sequences account for half of the human genome, most elements are no longer transposition competent. Moreover, transposons are normally repressed through epigenetic silencing in healthy adult tissues but become derepressed in several human cancers, with high activity detected in colorectal cancer. Their impact on non-malignant and malignant tissue as well as the differences between somatic and germline retrotransposition remain poorly understood. With new sequencing technologies, including long read sequencing, we can access intricacies of retrotransposition, such as insertion sequence details and nested repeats, that have been previously challenging to characterize.
resultsIn this study, we investigate somatic and germline retrotransposition by analyzing long read sequencing from 56 colorectal cancers and 112 uterine leiomyomas. We identified 1495 somatic insertions in colorectal samples, while striking lack of insertions was detected in uterine leiomyomas. Our findings highlight differences between somatic and germline events, such as transposon type distribution, insertion length, and target site preference. Leveraging long-read sequencing, we provide an in-depth analysis of the twin-priming phenomenon, detecting it across transposable element types that remain active in humans, including Alus. Additionally, we detect an abundance of germline transposons in repetitive DNA, along with a relationship between replication timing and insertion target site.
conclusionsOur study reveals a stark contrast in somatic transposon activity between colorectal cancers and uterine leiomyomas, and highlights differences between somatic and germline transposition. This suggests potentially different conditions in malignant and non-malignant tissues, as well as in germline and somatic tissues, which could be involved in the transposition process. Long-read sequencing provided important insights into transposon behavior, allowing detailed examination of structural features such as twin priming and nested elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.