ArticleBMC psychology2025
Assessment of chronic procrastination in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of Slavin model-based time management training on procrastination in nursing students: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The translation and validation of the procrastination and precrastination traits scale in the modern Arabic Language.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating the link between trait procrastination and college students' sleep quality: the mediating role of self-efficacy and executive function.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProcrastination, defined as the voluntary delay of intended actions, affects personal and academic tasks and is linked to decreased quality of life and well-being. This study evaluates the prevalence, causes, and effects of chronic procrastination among adults in Saudi Arabia, with a focus on demographic associations, psychological impacts, and coping strategies.
objectiveTo determine the prevalence of chronic procrastination among adults in Saudi Arabia, identify its demographic and psychological predictors, and evaluate its effects on personal well-being, academic performance, and daily functioning.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,093 participants, aged 18-55 years, residing in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through a self-administered online survey covering demographics, procrastination behaviors, and coping strategies. Statistical analysis, including chi-square and exact probability tests, identified associations between procrastination frequency and demographic factors.
resultsOf the participants, approximately 70% reported frequent procrastination, with academic tasks (56.6%) and household chores (13.9%) being the most delayed activities. Common reasons for procrastination included poor time management (76.2%), boredom (59.7%), and lack of motivation (57.3%). Over 65% experienced health impacts, such as sleep problems and stress. Procrastination significantly affected both personal life (55.1%) and work/studies (70%). Time management, task division, and deadline-setting were the most utilized strategies, though effectiveness varied.
conclusionThe study indicates a high prevalence of procrastination among young adults, particularly students, with detrimental impacts on personal and academic functioning. Training programs focused on time management and prioritization could help reduce procrastination. CATEGORIES: Psychology, Behavioral science, Time management, Well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.