ArticleBMC health services research2025
Health and social care staff's experiences working with adults with complex needs - a focus group study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Managers' experiences of collaboration and individual participation in integrated healthcare and social services for adults with complex needs: a focus group study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultimorbidity is increasing globally, affecting over one-third of the population. Adults with complex needs often experience physical, mental, and cognitive disorders, leading to increased healthcare utilization, reduced quality of life, and social challenges. The frequent co-occurrence of psychiatric conditions, substance abuse, addiction, and homelessness highlights the complexity of these needs. Collaboration between healthcare and social services is essential for delivering integrated care but is often hindered by legislative constraints and difficulties in coordinating care. Although integrated care has been shown to improve outcomes, persistent challenges affect staff in their daily work with adults with complex needs. Therefore, the aim was to describe health and social care staff's experiences working with adults with complex needs, with a focus on what promotes or hinders collaboration and the individual's participation.
methodsThis study employed a descriptive qualitative design. Data were collected through four focus group interviews with 17 health and social care staff members and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsData analysis resulted in three generic categories: (i) collaboration between authorities is complex, (ii) challenges working according to the person's needs, and (iii) participation under difficult conditions.
conclusionsThis study highlights both challenges and facilitators in working with adults with complex needs. Collaboration was hindered by legislative, financial, and organizational disparities but facilitated by interprofessional forums and collaborative meetings. Establishing trusting relationships free from bureaucratic constraints was important for providing person-centered care. However, fostering meaningful participation remains challenging because of the individual's limited capacity to engage and the complexities that staff face in balancing respect for autonomy with acting in the person's best interest. Further research incorporating perspectives from adults with complex needs, their relatives, and management could enhance the understanding of how collaboration, participation, and organizational barriers impact the provision of integrated healthcare and social services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.