ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Preoperative lymph node metastasis risk assessment in invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: development of a machine learning-based predictive model with a web-based calculator.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer characterized by a high risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The study aimed to identify predictors of LNM and to develop a machine learning (ML)-based risk prediction model for patients with breast IMPC.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 229 patients diagnosed with breast IMPC between 2019 and 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors for LNM were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Thirteen ML algorithms were trained and compared to determine the optimal model. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed using 100 iterations of tenfold cross-validation.
resultsLNM was present in 158 patients (69%). Tumor size, histological grade, progesterone receptor staining intensity, and lymphovascular invasion were identified as independent predictors of LNM (all p < 0.05). Among the 13 ML models, logistic regression (LR) demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.88 in the test set. A nomogram based on the LR model was constructed to facilitate clinical application, showing excellent calibration, clinical utility, and a classification accuracy of 76% (95% confidence interval: 70%-82%). The median AUC across cross-validation iterations was 0.83 (interquartile range: 0.76-0.91).
conclusionsThis study identified key predictors of LNM in breast IMPC and developed a well-calibrated nomogram to support individualized treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.