Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264110›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Validation of a mobile clinical pathology laboratory for canine hematology and biochemistry.

Théo Chenal, Matthias Lambert, Arthur Prieux, Emi Ludemann, Fanny Granat, Nathalie Bourgès-Abella, Catherine Trumel

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Théo ChenalLaboratoire Central de Biologie Médicale, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Matthias LambertLaboratoire Central de Biologie Médicale, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Arthur PrieuxLaboratoire Central de Biologie Médicale, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Emi LudemannLaboratoire Central de Biologie Médicale, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Fanny GranatLaboratoire Central de Biologie Médicale, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Nathalie Bourgès-AbellaCREFRE, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Catherine TrumelLaboratoire Central de Biologie Médicale, ENVT, Toulouse, France. catherine.trumel@envt.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical diagnosis and research, it is often essential to carry out laboratory tests that provide reliable results rapidly. However, in some circumstances, these tests are not available at the patient's location, leading to a delay before analysis that increases turnaround time and can cause pre-analytical errors. To this end, a new mobile laboratory van containing one hematology and one biochemistry benchtop analyzers was developed, and a validation study was performed under field conditions (i.e., after trips of varying distances) with canine specimens and quality control materials.

resultsLinearity was considered acceptable for all variables. Coefficient of variation was < 5% for biochemical variables and most hematological ones (0.0-8.11%) and imprecision was in line with the recommendations for all variables except for neutrophil count in the short-term imprecision. Observed total error for albumin with the quality control material was higher than allowable total error, secondary to a high bias. The comparison with the same model of analyzer showed significant bias for nearly all variables but observed total error remained lower than acceptable total error for all variables except for lymphocyte and reticulocyte counts.

conclusionBoth analyzers exhibited acceptable performance in the mobile laboratory operating conditions, making them suitable for future use in the field.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisDog DiseasesHematologic TestsHematologyLaboratories, ClinicalMobile Health UnitsAnimalsBlood Cell CountDogsQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsBenchtop analyzerBiochemistryCanineHematologyLaboratory vanMobile laboratoryOn-fieldPOCAValidation study

Identifiers

PMID40264110
PMCPMC12013186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.