ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Effects of new assembled titanium mesh cage on the improvement in biomechanical performance of single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-stabilizing zero-profile 3D-printed vertebral body versus traditional titanium mesh-cage with plate in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: an open-label randomized controlled trial on efficacy and complications for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Trial
- Is preoperative cervical range of motion associated with cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effects of a novel anatomic fusion cage for anterior cervical corpectomy: a finite element study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) with Traditional Titanium Mesh Cages (TTMCs) can lead to complications such as cage subsidence, dysphagia, and implant-related issues. These complications suggest that the biomechanical stability of ACCF with TTMC may be insufficient. This study aims to evaluate whether a New Assembled Titanium Mesh Cage (NTMC) can improve the biomechanical performance after ACCF.
methodsACCF procedures using both TTMC and NTMC models were constructed and compared. The range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segments and stress peaks in various regions including the endplate, bone-screw interface, facet joints, and adjacent intervertebral discs were analyzed.
resultsThe use of NTMC significantly reduced the postoperative ROM of the surgical segments by 80.7%-82.0% compared to ACCF with TTMC. Additionally, stress peaks at the endplate, bone-screw interface, and facet contact force (FCF) were higher in ACCF with TTMC compared to NTMC. TTMC also induced higher stress peaks in the C3/4 and C6/7 intervertebral discs (ranging from 0.2009-6.961 MPa and 0.2477-4.735 MPa, respectively), followed by the NTMC (ranging from 0.1322-3.820 MPa and 0.2227-4.104 MPa, respectively).
conclusionsThe utilization of NTMC, which includes enlarged spacers and emulates endplate geometries, effectively reduces the risks of cage subsidence and instrument-related complications in ACCF. Furthermore, ACCF with NTMC also decreases the risks of dysphagia, facet joint degeneration, and adjacent disc degeneration during the follow-up period by altering the fixing method while maintaining construct stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.