ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Screening risk factors for the occurrence of wedge effects in intramedullary nail fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in older people via machine learning and constructing a prediction model: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of malignancy risk in Bethesda III nodules: development and validation of multiple machine learning models.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe wedge effect (V-effect) is a common complication in intramedullary nailing surgery for intertrochanteric fractures and can significantly affect postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to screen risk factors for the intraoperative V-effect in intertrochanteric fractures and to develop a clinical prediction model.
methodsA total of 319 patients (77 patients who developed V-effects) from China were randomly divided into a training set (n = 223) and a validation set (n = 96) at a ratio of 7:3. The variables were screened via 3 machine learning methods, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, the Boruta algorithm, and recursive feature elimination (RFE). Variables that appeared in the three machine learning methods were included in multivariate logistic regression to construct predictive models. Spearman correlation analysis was used to exclude covariance between variables. Restricted cubic splines (RCSs) were used to analyze the relationships among femoral lateral wall thickness, BMI, and the V effect. The differentiation, calibration and clinical applicability of the model were assessed, and the reasonability of the model was analyzed.
resultsMachine learning identified 8 variables that appeared in these 3 machine learning methods, and the covariance between these 8 variables was excluded (r < 0.6). BMI, surgical experience, a lesser trochanteric fracture, the thickness of the lateral wall, the insertion point, bone density, fracture classification, and holiday surgery were found to be risk factors for the occurrence of the V-effect via multivariate logistic regression. The RCS analysis revealed that the lateral wall thickness, BMI, and occurrence of the V effect were linearly related. The final predictive model had good differentiation, calibration and clinical applicability, and it had better predictive efficacy than the other models did.
conclusionThis study employed three machine learning variable selection methods-the LASSO, RFE, and Boruta algorithms-to construct a V-effect predictive model. The model enables orthopedic surgeons to better understand the risk factors associated with the V-effect and provides a reference for surgeons to implement appropriate measures to reduce the incidence of the V-effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.