Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264081›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Does platelet-rich fibrin enhance the outcomes of peri-implant soft tissues? A systematic review.

Enrica Giammarinaro, Nicola Baldini, Ugo Covani, Maria Menini, Paolo Pesce, Simone Marconcini

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07667855 (Peri-implant Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Microneedling With i-PRF vs. Connective Tissue Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07667855 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Peri-implant Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Microneedling With i-PRF vs. Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeirut Arab UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled24ConditionsThin Peri-implant Mucosal PhenotypeArmsConnective Tissue Graft (CTG), Microneedling with Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (MN+i-PRF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Enrica GiammarinaroResearch fellow at the Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy. e.giammarinaro@gmail.com.
Nicola BaldiniDepartment of Biomedical and Medical Sciences, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, 16, Siena, 53100, Italy.
Ugo CovaniResearch fellow at the Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Maria MeniniDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), Division of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi 10, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Paolo PesceDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), Division of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, University of Genoa, Largo R. Benzi 10, Genova, 16132, Italy.
Simone MarconciniResearch fellow at the Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving soft tissue quality and quantity around dental implants is crucial for successful outcomes. Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) is showing promise in enhancing wound healing and implant stability. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical benefits of PRF in soft tissue regeneration around dental implants compared to standard methods.

methodsThis systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and utilizing the PICO methodology, investigated the use of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in soft tissue augmentation during implant therapy. The primary outcomes assessed include the width of keratinized mucosa and soft tissue thickness, comparing PRF interventions to standard techniques.The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies, focusing on human patients needing implant therapy with or without PRF. An extensive search of databases and manual references was conducted; data extraction involved assessing study quality and risk of bias, but due to high heterogeneity among studies, a meta-analysis was not feasible, leading to a systematic review of the available literature.

resultsA total of 766 references were initially identified, with 29 being eligible after screening. Nine studies were included for detailed review. The findings revealed that PRF is effective in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa (KT) and soft tissue thickness (STT) around implants. Even if free gingival grafts (FGG) sometimes performed better. However, the differences between PRF and FGG were not clinically significant, and PRF offers lower cost, ease of use, and reduced morbidity. There was limited information on the esthetic outcomes of PRF, with only two studies addressing this aspect, showing mixed results.

conclusionOverall, PRF demonstrated positive effects on KT width and STT, but further research with rigorous methodology and larger sample sizes is needed to better understand its impact on implants health and esthetics.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsGingivaPlatelet-Rich FibrinHumansWound HealingDental ImplantsAutologous platelets concentratesDental implantsPlatelet-rich fibrinSoft tissuesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40264081
PMCPMC12016366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.