Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264078›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Understanding healthcare demand and supply through causal loop diagrams and system archetypes: policy implications for kidney replacement therapy in Thailand.

Siobhan Botwright, Yot Teerawattananon, Natcha Yongphiphatwong, Jeerath Phannajit, Kinanti Khansa Chavarina, Jiratorn Sutawong, Le Khanh Ngan Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siobhan BotwrightHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand. siobhan.b@hitap.net.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Natcha YongphiphatwongThailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jeerath PhannajitDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kinanti Khansa ChavarinaHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Jiratorn SutawongHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) Foundation, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Le Khanh Ngan NguyenUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Health Systems and Research Institute (HSRI), Thailand HSRI 67-067National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) through the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation B41G670025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems thinking approaches can determine system interdependencies to guide effective policymaking but have been underutilised in health policymaking, particularly for policies related to access and delivery of health services. In Thailand, a policy changing access to dialysis services for patients with kidney failure in 2022 had resulted in an unexpected surge in patients, mortality rate, and budget overspend. This study applied systems thinking to characterise the dynamics underlying the unforeseen impact of the 2022 policy, in order to propose context-specific policy interventions.

methodsWe developed a causal loop diagram through iterative stakeholder engagement, to understand the drivers for supply and demand of dialysis under the 2022 policy in Thailand. Since systems thinking was considered a new tool for policymaking, we used system archetypes as a means by which to collapse down the complexity of causal loop diagrams into simple narratives for policymakers. Confidence-building (validation) was conducted through triangulation across data sources and steps to facilitate stakeholder critique throughout the process.

resultsChronic underinvestment in peritoneal dialysis had failed to capitalise on improvements in expertise and quality of services, while a series of short-term measures to overcome constraints in haemodialysis supply had unintentionally increased haemodialysis demand in the long-term, increasing strain on the healthcare system. By applying generic solution archetypes, we identified a series of measures to balance demand for services with system capacity, including better alignment of incentives with health system goals, proactive planning to anticipate future supply needs, and regulatory mechanisms to moderate demand according to available supply.

conclusionsA major implication of this research is that changes to healthcare access and delivery require multi-stakeholder engagement and whole system thinking, as even small changes can have potentially vast consequences. Applying a systems thinking lens not only communicated the reasons for unintended impact of the 2022 policy, but also identified interventions absent from the literature that were unique to the drivers of demand and supply in Thailand.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Services Needs and DemandKidney Failure, ChronicPolicy MakingRenal Replacement TherapyHumansRenal DialysisThailandCausal loop diagramComplex systemsDialysisHealth servicesKidney replacement therapySystem dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40264078
PMCPMC12016352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.