ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Development and validation of a predictive model for suicidal thoughts and behaviors among freshmen.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are fewer studies on prospective predictors of first-time suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) among first-year university students and fewer studies prospectively identifying and screening for those at high risk of suicide among college students. This study assessed the impact of prospective baseline variables on the risk of new STB onset among first-year university students over two years and developed a multivariate risk prediction model.
methods4,560 first-year university students (38.4% males, mean age:18.34) from China participated and completed this prospective cohort study over a three-year period from 2018 to 2020. LASSO regression, and logistic regression models under resilient networks, were used for risk predictor variable screening and final prediction model building. Independent validation sets were used for external validation of the models. Independent validation sets were used for external validation of the models. Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, F1 scores, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test metrics were used to evaluate the model performance.
resultsThe incidence rates of suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviors, and STB within two years were 4.89%,1.03%, and 4.96%, respectively. Predictors in the final model included females, always solo activity, bigotry under pressure, socially oriented perfectionism, drinking to relieve stress, autonomy attitude, poorer parental marriage satisfaction, maternal emotional warmth, perceived others social support, and number of lifetime severe traumatic events. The predictive model had an AUC of 0.738 (95% CI: 0.697-0.780) for predictive accuracy in the training dataset as well as 0.710 (95% CI: 0.657-0.763) for predictive accuracy in the validation dataset, which represents a high degree of model discrimination.
conclusionBased on this predictive model of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, this study may help to assess and screen college students at risk for STB and develop suicide prevention strategies for at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.