ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Optimizing machine learning models for predicting anemia among under-five children in Ethiopia: insights from Ethiopian demographic and health survey data.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting childhood anemia in Mozambique: analysis from national survey data.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Improved prediction of childhood anemia using hybrid ensemble learning and dual-level explainability.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Predicting Childhood Anaemia in Nigeria: A Machine Learning Approach to Uncover Key Risk Factors.Public health challenges · 2025Article
- Predicting childhood anaemia in Ghana with explainable machine learning: A national survey analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare practitioners require a robust predictive system to accurately diagnose diseases, especially in young children with conditions such as anemia. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can have severe consequences, potentially leading to serious complications and childhood mortality. By leveraging machine learning methods with extensive datasets, valuable and scientifically sound insights can be generated to address pressing health and healthcare-related challenges.
objectivesThe primary objective of this study was to identify the most effective machine-learning algorithm for predicting anemia among under five children in Ethiopia.
methodsThe data utilized in this study were sourced from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Six machine-learning models, comprising a classic logistic regression model along with random forest, decision tree, support vector machine, Naïve Bayes, and K-nearest neighbors, were employed to predict factors influencing anemia in children under five. The predictive capacities of each machine-learning model were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and various measures of model accuracy.
resultsThe random forest model demonstrated the highest accuracy among the algorithms tested, achieving an overall accuracy of 81.16%. The accuracy rates for the decision tree, support vector machines, Naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, and classical logistic regression models were 68.40%, 59.94%, 53.06%, 69.96%, and 54.79%, respectively.
conclusionIn general, the random forest algorithm emerged as the preferred model for predicting anemia in children under five. The model exhibited a specificity of 79.26%, sensitivity of 83.07%, positive predictive value of 80.02%, negative predictive value of 82.40%, and an area under the curve of 81.80%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.