Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40264055›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2025

Development of explainable artificial intelligence based machine learning model for predicting 30-day hospital readmission after renal transplantation.

Nasser Alnazari, Omar Ibrahim Alanazi, Muath Owaidh Alosaimi, Ziyad Mohamed Alanazi, Ziyad Mohammed Alhajeri, Khaled Mohammed Alhussaini, Abdulkarim Mekhlif Alanazi, Ahmed Y Azzam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hospital Readmissions in People with CKD: Moving a Stubborn Needle.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nasser AlnazariHepatobiliary Science and Organ Transplant Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Alnazarina@ngha.med.sa.
Omar Ibrahim AlanaziKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muath Owaidh AlosaimiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad Mohamed AlanaziKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad Mohammed AlhajeriKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled Mohammed AlhussainiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulkarim Mekhlif AlanaziKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Y AzzamMedical Big Data Research Center, SNU Medical Research Center, Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital readmission following renal transplantation significantly impacts patient outcomes and healthcare resources. While machine learning approaches offer promising solutions for risk prediction, their clinical application often lacks interpretability. We developed an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based supervised learning model to predict 30-day hospital readmission risk following renal transplantation.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 588 renal transplant recipients at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, with a predominance of living donor transplants (85.2%, n = 500). Our methodology included a four-stage machine learning pipeline: data processing, feature preparation, model development using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and clinical validation. Multiple algorithms were evaluated, with gradient boosting demonstrating superior performance. Model interpretability was achieved through dual-approach analysis using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations).

resultsThe gradient boosting model demonstrated strong performance (AUC 0.837, 95% CI: 0.802-0.872) with accuracy of 0.796 ± 0.050 and sensitivity of 0.388 ± 0.129. Length of hospital stay (38.0% contribution) and post-transplant systolic blood pressure (30.0% contribution) emerged as primary predictors, with differences between living and deceased donor subgroups. Pre-transplant BMI showed a higher importance in deceased donor recipients (12.6% vs. 2.6%), while HbA1c and eGFR were more impacting in living donor outcomes. The readmission rate in our cohort (88.9%, n = 523) was higher than previously reported ranges (18-47%), likely reflecting center-specific practices.

conclusionsOur XAI-based machine learning model combines strong predictive performance with clinical interpretability, offering transplant physicians donor-specific risk stratification capabilities. The web-based implementation facilitates practical integration into clinical workflows. Given our single-center experience and high proportion of living donors, external validation across diverse transplant centers is essential before widespread implementation. Our approach establishes a framework for developing center-specific risk prediction tools in transplant medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceKidney TransplantationMachine LearningPatient ReadmissionAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment30-day readmissionExplainable artificial intelligenceMachine learningPrecision medicineRenal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40264055
PMCPMC12013099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.