ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Prediction of abnormal bone mass with a pericoronary adipose tissue Attenuation model.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim is to explore the value of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation in predicting abnormal bone mass by establishing a prediction model. MATERIALS AND
methods361 patients with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans were retrospectively recruited. 311 patients from institution 1 from July 2021 to January 2023 were divided into a training cohort (n = 217) and an internal cohort (n = 94). The external cohort comprised 50 patients from institution 2 from January 2023 to August 2023. Clinical variables and PCAT attenuation of the major epicardial vessels were obtained. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors with statistical significance. Model 1 was constructed based on clinical variables. Model 2 was constructed by combining the clinical variables with the PCAT attenuation. The performances of the models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsAge, gender, coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS), statins and RCA
conclusionThe model incorporating clinical factors and RCA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.