ArticleBasic and clinical andrology2025
Prevalence of masturbation and masturbation guilt and associations with partnered sex among married heterosexual Chinese males in an outpatient clinical setting: a retrospective single center study.
Article in Basic and clinical andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between a history of frequent masturbation and anxiety/depression in patients with psychogenic erectile dysfunction.Basic and clinical andrology · 2026Article
- Sexual Behaviour and Masturbation Practices: Impacts on Psychological well-being among tertiary students in Ghana.Reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSolo masturbation is not an activity performed exclusively in single males but can also occur among married males, and is often associated with feelings of guilt. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of solo masturbation and associated masturbation guilt and the possible associated factors, including age, residence type (rural or urban), duration of marriage, parental status, income level, education level, body mass index, current smoking and drinking status, anxiety and depression status and their possible associations with the frequency of partnered sex among married heterosexual Chinese males. MATERIALS AND
methodsA series of males attending our outpatient clinic were included and analyzed in the study. Approximately 71.2% (334/469) of these males had engaged in masturbation during the studying period, whereas 76.6% (256/334) of those who reported engaging in masturbation reported at least some sense of guilt.
resultsMasturbation frequency was weakly positively associated with young age (OR 1.11) and education level (OR 1.24), whereas weak positive correlations were found between masturbation guilt and young age, anxiety and depression level (ORs ranged from 1.08 to 1.30). In addition, we found that the frequency of partnered sex was weakly positively associated with a masturbation frequency of less than once a month (adjusted OR 1.50) and once a month (adjusted OR 1.35). A weak positive correlation was observed between the frequency of partnered sex and a little sense of guilt (adjusted OR 1.60). In contrast, a weak negative association was observed between the frequency of partnered sex and a very big sense of guilt, with an adjusted OR of 1.67.
conclusionsIn summary, in married heterosexual Chinese males, masturbation along with its associated guilt is a relatively frequent phenomenon. We obtained evidence supporting both compensatory and complementary relationships between masturbation, masturbation guilt and the frequency of partnered sex. Masturbation and its related guilt should receive more attention in clinical practice, given its high prevalence and possible relationship with partnered sex and couple relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.