ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Comparative evaluation of proteinase K and dithiothreitol as pretreatments for extracting nucleic acids from respiratory samples for multiplex PCR.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA sequencing for microbial surveillance in cystic fibrosis airways: advances, challenges, and clinical translation.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Enzyme-enhanced RNA isolation from biofilm-producing bacteria.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLower respiratory tract infections are frequently caused by bacteria, and the rapid identification of pathogens is crucial for guiding treatment. Multiplex PCR(M-PCR) can detect multiple pathogens simultaneously, but mucus and other cells in lower respiratory tract samples may interfere with nucleic acid detection. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of two pretreatment methods-proteinase K(PK) and dithiothreitol(DTT)-in detecting multiple pathogens using M-PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF) and sputum samples.
methodsA total of 30 BALF samples and 20 sputum samples were collected. These samples were pretreated with PK and DTT, respectively. Bacterial structural changes and background material were examined using Gram staining. Nucleic acid purity and concentration were assessed following extraction. Finally, the detection rate of several common pathogens associated with lower respiratory tract infections was analyzed using M-PCR.
resultsGram staining indicated that both PK and DTT effectively destroyed the bacterial structure and reduced background material in BALF samples, while DTT was more effective samples compared to PK in sputum. The M-PCR results indicated no significant difference in Ct values for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa between PK and DTT-treated BALF samples. The results of nucleic acid extraction showed no difference in purity and concentration of nucleic acids after treatment with PK and DTT in BALF and sputum samples. After PK treatment, the Ct values for the four bacteria in sputum samples were different from those in BALF samples treated with the three methods, while after DTT treatment, only K. pneumoniae and H. influenzae showed differences compared to BALF. There was no difference in bacterial detection rates between PK and DTT treatments of BALF, both of which were 100%. In sputum samples, the bacterial detection rate after DTT treatment was 100%, significantly higher than the 87.5% detection rate after PK treatment (P < 0.05).
conclusionPK and DTT exhibited similar pretreatment effects on BALF samples, with neither having an impact on the results. However, DTT was superior to PK in reducing interference and enhancing the sensitivity of M-PCR for bacterial detection in sputum samples, making it the preferred pretreatment for sputum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.