ArticleBMC cancer2025
The quality of life of colorectal cancer patients attending the cancer center in addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second most deadly. CRC significantly impairs patients' overall and health-related quality of life, as well as their psychological and physical function. However, in Ethiopia, there is insufficient local evidence about the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer. Hence, this study aimed to assess the quality of life of adult colorectal cancer patients who have follow-ups at the cancer center in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
methodsAn institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 159 colorectal cancer patients attending the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Cancer Center from February to April 2019. The validated Amharic version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30) and the disease-specific colorectal cancer questionnaire (EORTC QLQ CR-29) were used. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with quality of life. The adjusted measure of effect (AOR) with a 95% CI was presented and P < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.
resultsThere were 159 colorectal cancer patients, 89 of whom were male, and the median time from diagnosis was 12.5 months. The patients had a low global health status score with a mean (± SD) of 52.88 ± 21.02. Being employed (AOR = 3.41; 95% CI 1.15, 10.17), early-stage clinical diagnosis (AOR = 4.98; 95% CI 1.51, 16.4), physical functioning (AOR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.06), and social functioning (AOR = 1.02; 95% CI 1.01, 1.04) were associated with good quality of life. Whereas, being female (AOR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.05, 0.52), having financial difficulty (AOR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 0.99), and having blood and mucus in the stool (AOR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.91, 0.96) were associated with poor quality of life.
conclusionIn our study, half of our study participants had poor quality of life. The responsible stakeholders should identify and address the patients' respective symptoms. Female patients, those in severe clinical stages, unemployed patients, those experiencing financial difficulties, and those with blood and mucus in their stool should receive due attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.