ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2025
Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of screen time with adolescent depression and anxiety.
Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Young minds in distress: Exploring the global rise in youth mental health diagnoses.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Mental health and depression as mediators between social media use screen time and academic integrity among tertiary students in Ghana.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The relationship between parenting stress and preschool children's screen dependence: the chain mediating role of parent-child interaction quality and executive function.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of screen time with adolescent depression and anxiety.The British journal of clinical psychology · 2025Article
- The longitudinal impact of screen media activities on brain function, architecture and mental health in early adolescence.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe relationship between screen time and mental health in adolescents is debated in the scientific literature, with longitudinal studies lacking. This study examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between screen time and depression and anxiety and the influence of maladaptive social media use and gender on these associations.
methodsWe analysed a sample of 4058 adolescents (mean age = 13.9) recruited from 134 Australian schools as part of the Future Proofing Study, a 5-year prospective cohort study of adolescent mental health. Linear mixed models used Time 1 and Time 2 (12-month follow-up) data to examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of screen time with depression and anxiety and the influence of maladaptive social media use and gender.
resultsScreen time was associated with mental health symptoms cross-sectionally, with each additional hour of screen time corresponding with a 1.25 and .79 increase in measures of depression and anxiety, respectively. Longitudinally, these associations were markedly weaker. Each additional hour of screen time corresponded with only a .15 increase in depression at 12 months and showed no association with anxiety at 12 months. Neither gender nor maladaptive social media use substantially influenced screen time-symptom associations.
conclusionsCompared to cross-sectional associations, longitudinal associations were weak, indicating that high screen time is unlikely to cause depression and anxiety; instead, observed relationships may be bidirectional. Experimental studies to understand the nuances underlying the relationship between screen time and mental health are needed to support the development of targeted strategies that promote healthy screen time habits among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.