Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263972›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025

Photoaging and Cosmetic Result with Artificial Daylight Photo-dynamic Therapy Using Methyl Aminolevulinate.

Rolf-Markus Szeimies, Matthias Brückner, Matthias Hoffmann, Melvin Baé, Jörg Fränken, Bernd Großmann, Uwe Paasch, Sven Quist, Berenice M Lang, Rajeev Chavda and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05725213 (Non-interventional Study Investigating Photodynamic Therapy With Artificial Daylight Under Routine Clinical Conditions in Patients With Actinic Keratosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05725213 completednot on this map

Non-interventional Study Investigating Photodynamic Therapy With Artificial Daylight Under Routine Clinical Conditions in Patients With Actinic Keratosis (ArtLight)

TypeobservationalSponsorGalderma Laboratorium GmbHRan2022 to 2023Enrolled224ConditionsActinic KeratosesArmsMetvix® 160 mg/g Creme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rolf-Markus SzeimiesKnappschaft Kliniken Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen, Germany. Rolf-Markus.Szeimies@knappschaft-kliniken.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8452-0737
Matthias BrücknerGalderma Laboratorium GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Matthias HoffmannHautarztpraxis Dr. Hoffmann, Witten, Germany.
Melvin BaéPrivatpraxis Dermatologie am Luisenplatz, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-8535-6131
Jörg FränkenDermatologische Praxis Dr. med. Fränken, Schwelm, Germany.
Bernd GroßmannMVZ Fokus-Haut Corius Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Uwe PaaschHautarztpraxis Hautaerzte-paasch.de, Jesewitz OT Gotha, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-0284
Sven QuistBAG Drs. Quist, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-7813
Berenice M LangKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-3777
Rajeev ChavdaGalderma SA, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-1563
Wolfgang G Philipp-DormstonHautzentrum Köln (Cologne Dermatology), Köln, Germany; Faculty of Health, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-2369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate is an effective and almost painless treatment approach for actinic keratoses. The objective of the prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study ArtLight (NCT05725213) was to gain comprehensive insights into the cosmetic effect of methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy in patients with actinic keratoses using different artificial daylight systems under real-world conditions. The study enrolled patients with Olsen grade 1 or 2 actinic keratoses on the face and scalp in Germany. Patients were treated with methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy. The cosmetic effect was assessed via photodamage parameters (global score for photoaging, mottled pigmentation, tactile roughness, telangiectasias, fine lines). Each photodamage variable was recorded on a 5-point scale (0-4). In total, 224 patients (median age: 75.0 years [range 50-91], 85.3% male, 62.5% Olsen grade 2, 55.4% treatment-naive) were treated with methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy. At month 3, all 5 parameters of photoaging were significantly reduced from baseline (p < 0.001). The majority of patients (81.3%) and investigators (83.6%) rated the cosmetic result as good or very good. Beyond effective eradication of actinic keratoses, field-directed methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy can improve photoaging symptoms, including tactile roughness, mottled pigmentation, telangiectasis, and fine lines. Thus methyl aminolevulinate-artificial daylight photodynamic therapy provides additional benefits, particularly for patients concerned with cosmetic outcomes during or after treatment.

Indexed as

Aminolevulinic AcidFacial DermatosesKeratosis, ActinicPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsSkin AgingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesScalp DermatosesSkin PigmentationAminolevulinic Acidmethyl 5-aminolevulinatePhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID40263972
PMCPMC12041794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.