ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025
Clinical perspective: Advancing hemophilia treatment through gene therapy approaches.
Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building a gene editing lexicon: a model for rare and inherited disorders.Gene therapy · 2026Article
- Impact of antiplatelet therapy on the hemostatic efficacy of platelet-targeted FVIII gene therapy in hemophilia A mice.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Current Status of Clinical Gene Therapy for Hemophilia and Globin Disorders.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Defining the Role of Nurses in Gene Therapy for Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia, a congenital bleeding disorder, can cause arthropathy, impaired mobility, pain, and life-threatening hemorrhage events, significantly impacting quality of life for patients and caregivers. Current therapies, although effective, necessitate costly lifelong treatment, often in specialized settings. However, as a monogenic disorder caused by loss-of-function genetic variants, hemophilia is amenable to gene therapy. In this article, three primary gene therapy approaches at the forefront of clinical development are reviewed. Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy, having secured approval in the EU, UK, and US after promising phase 3 trial results, demonstrates clear superiority over standard-of-care treatment. Lentivirus-based approaches capable of transducing dividing and nondividing cells may improve the durability of treatment and have low susceptibility to pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to viral vectors. Finally, gene editing techniques such as zinc finger nucleases and CRISPR aim to correct genetic defects directly, holding promise as novel, effective, and highly durable therapeutic strategies in adults and children with hemophilia. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the current status of these gene therapy approaches, highlighting advantages, limitations, and potential future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.