Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263768›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025

An effective approach to assessing inter-root distances using tooth models without repeated cone-beam computed tomography scans during orthodontic treatment.

Haeun Moon, Jaewon Koh, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Phimon Atsawasuwan, Min Kyeong Lee, Kyungmin Clara Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haeun MoonDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4205-8360
Jaewon KohDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1618-8136
Veerasathpurush AllareddyDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8199-6206
Phimon AtsawasuwanDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2576-060X
Min Kyeong LeeDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9922-8272
Kyungmin Clara LeeDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-4550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To propose the utilization of virtual tooth models (VTMs) created by combining tooth root data from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and crown data gathered through intraoral scanning to assess inter-root distance and angulation during orthodontic treatment when repeated radiographic monitoring becomes necessary. Methods: Patients with planned dental implant placement in edentulous areas during or after orthodontic treatment and who underwent intraoral and CBCT scans at the pretreatment and posttreatment stages were selected. Tooth models were fabricated by merging intraorally scanned crowns with the corresponding CBCT-scanned roots from the pretreatment. Tooth positions posttreatment was estimated by integrating models into posttreatment intraoral scans. Moreover, the actual positions were obtained from posttreatment CBCTs. Discrepancies in the estimated and actual tooth positions, including inter-radicular distances and inter-root angulations, were compared. Results: The minimum inter-radicular distance between two adjacent teeth demonstrated no significant difference between the estimated and actual tooth positions. The difference in inter-root angulation was not statistically significant. Most inter-radicular distances measured at each landmark revealed no significant differences between the estimated and actual tooth positions, except at the buccolingual midpoint of the cemento-enamel junction, where a slight discrepancy was observed. Conclusions: The tooth position of VTMs demonstrated clinically acceptable accuracy compared to CBCT scans. Additionally, VTMs can benefit both clinicians and patients by enabling accurate assessment of the inter-radicular space for dental implant placement without repeated CBCT scans.

Indexed as

Cone-beam computed tomographyInter-radicular spaceIntraoral scansTooth model

Identifiers

PMID40263768
PMCPMC12100341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.