ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025
Enhancing patient positioning accuracy: evaluating daily cone beam computed tomography in the halcyon system.
Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An end-to-end quality assurance procedure for pelvic VMAT using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters and an anthropomorphic phantom.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk stratification and cross-center prediction of thoracoabdominal 6D setup errors.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Transformer-based prediction of radiotherapy couch shift risk in prostate cancer based on rectal volume.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise patient positioning is crucial for successful radiotherapy, ensuring accurate delivery of radiation to tumors while minimizing exposure to healthy tissues. Positional errors can significantly impact treatment efficacy and increase side effects. This study evaluates the effectiveness of daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the Halcyon system for detecting and correcting patient misalignments across various cancer types and treatment sites.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 411 patients treated with the Varian Halcyon linear accelerator from August 2022 to August 2024. Patients were grouped based on tumor location: Head and Neck (118 patients), Chest (188 patients), and Pelvis (105 patients). Daily pre-treatment CBCT scans were performed to verify positioning, with shifts in the x, y, and z axes quantified and adjusted using automated couch corrections.
resultsThe study revealed average positional shifts along the x-axis of ~0.112 cm, while both the Chest and Pelvic groups recorded 0.194 cm. The y-axis deviations were 0.135 cm for Head and Neck, 0.206 cm for Chest, and 0.195 cm for the Pelvis. On the z-axis, a mean deviation of 0.07 cm was found for the Head and Neck group, while 0.11 cm for the Chest group, and 0.085 cm for the Pelvic group. The Head and Neck group exhibited the smallest standard deviations across all axes, indicating greater positional consistency. Normalized density distributions showed distinct emergent patterns, the Head and Neck group showing tighter distributions compared to the broader distributions observed in the Chest and Pelvic groups.
conclusionsDaily CBCT imaging in the Halcyon system significantly enhances patient positioning accuracy in radiotherapy. The findings demonstrate that this approach minimizes positional shifts, particularly in the Head and Neck region, essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and reducing the risk of adverse effects. Future studies should further explore the integration of advanced imaging techniques to improve precision in patient positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.