ArticleDementia (London, England)2026
Dementia in the minds of characters and readers - A transdisciplinary study of fictional language.
Article in Dementia (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of personhood in dementia has maintained its status as the definitive approach to dementia care. Personhood works at both practical and philosophical levels to maintain the humanity of people with dementia. The project described in this article used the concept of personhood to design community-engaged research which harnessed the power of literary language to access the internal life of a person with dementia. Here we outline the design and methods in detail, homing in on our main conclusion that literary language is a powerful tool in helping diverse stakeholder groups access the person in dementia. The research comprised three inter-linked strands. In Strand One we built a corpus of dementia fiction from which we identified twelve extracts from contemporary novels offering the internal perspective of a person with dementia. Strand Two involved six weekly meetings of separate reading groups with four distinct stakeholder groups - student social workers, members of the public, family carers, and people with dementia. The four groups engaged in separate, facilitated discussions of the extracts. This aspect of the project is unique as to the best of our knowledge no previous research has analysed readers' responses to extracts of fictional characters' narration of living with dementia. Strand Three was led by a well-known writer and comprised a series of public events and outputs which engaged readers and authors of dementia fiction with the genre. A dementia fiction festival and writer workshops resulted in publication of an anthology of short stories which included stories addressing a deficiency of racial and ethnically diverse characters noted in our corpus. The article concludes by discussing how working across disciplines and sectors to engage with dementia as a cultural as well as a clinical challenge has the potential to facilitate the understanding and emphasis of personhood in dementia studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.