ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning based identification of suicidal ideation using non-suicidal predictors in a university mental health clinic.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting suicidal ideation in academic communities using machine learning methods: a cross-sectional study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- A scoping review of the use of artificial intelligence as a psychological assessment tool.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning prediction of tracheostomy after craniotomy for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Indirect, machine learning-based suicide risk screening: Evidence from cross-National Validation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide causes over 700,000 deaths annually worldwide. Mental disorders are closely linked to suicidal ideation, but predicting suicide remains complex due to the multifaceted nature of contributing factors. Traditional assessment tools often fail to capture the interactions that drive suicidal thoughts, underscoring the need for more sophisticated predictive approaches. This study aimed to predict suicidal and self-harm ideation among university students using machine learning models without relying on suicidal behavior related predictors. The goal was to uncover less obvious risk factors and provide deeper insights into the complex relationships between psychiatric symptoms and suicidal ideation. Data from 924 university students seeking mental health services were analyzed using seven machine learning algorithms. Suicidal ideation was assessed through the 9th item of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Three predictive models were developed, with the final model utilizing only subdomains from the DSM-5 Level 1 Self Rated Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure. Feature importance was assessed using SHAP and Integrated Gradients techniques. To ensure model generalizability, the best-performing model was externally validated on a separate dataset of 361 individuals. Machine learning models achieved strong predictive accuracy, with logistic regression and neural networks reaching AUC values of 0.80. The final model achieved an AUC of 0.80 on the training data and 0.79 on external validation data. Key predictors of suicidal ideation included personality functioning and depressed mood (both increasing the likelihood), while anxiety and repetitive thoughts were associated with a decreased likelihood. The use of non-suicidal predictors across datasets highlighted psychiatric dimensions relevant to early intervention. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning in predicting suicidal ideation without relying on suicide-specific inputs. The findings emphasize the critical roles of personality functioning, mood, and anxiety in shaping suicidal ideation. These insights can enhance early detection and personalized interventions, especially in individuals reluctant to disclose suicidal thoughts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.