ArticleScientific reports2025
Circulating eosinophil cell-free DNA as a noninvasive biomarker for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients-a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design, Development, and Clinical Validation of a Novel Kit for Cell-Free DNA Extraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendicitis is the most common condition necessitating emergency abdominal surgery. While most cases are localized, 20% become complicated, resulting in perforation. The management of non-complicated appendicitis varies across medical centers, encompassing both surgical and non-surgical options, whereas complicated appendicitis is predominantly managed surgically. Differentiating them is clinically challenging, especially in pediatric patients, crucial for guiding appropriate treatment strategies. Therefore, there is an unmet need for biomarkers to distinguish the two entities. Here we examined the utility of epigenetic liquid biopsies in appendicitis. We used DNA methylation markers specific to immune and gastrointestinal epithelial cells to assess the tissue origins of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in appendicitis patients. Appendix epithelium cfDNA was undetected in plasma samples from children with appendicitis relative to control groups. In contrast, neutrophil and regulatory T-cell cfDNA were elevated in appendicitis enhancing the specificity and sensitivity of appendicitis diagnosis beyond the information provided by neutrophil counts. Notably, eosinophil cfDNA was most significantly elevated in children with perforated compared with non-perforated appendicitis. This finding was cross-validated using a machine-learning approach. In conclusion, eosinophil cfDNA levels are elevated in children with a perforated appendix and may have potential as a non-invasive aid in diagnosing perforated appendicitis in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.