Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263438›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effects of repeated fecal transplantation and activated charcoal treatment on gut dysbiosis induced by concurrent ceftriaxone administration in mice.

Sarinya Kumpunya, Kornthara Kawang, Kraiwit Pollapong, Voraphoj Nilaratanakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarinya KumpunyaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kornthara KawangDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kraiwit PollapongMedical Microbiology Interdisciplinary, Graduate school, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Voraphoj NilaratanakulDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. voraphoj.n@chula.ac.th.

Funding

Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University RA-MF-52/64Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University HEA_FF_68_079_3000_013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic treatment contributes to gut microbiota dysbiosis. Previous studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), fecal filtrate (FF), and activated charcoal (AC) treatments can prevent gut microbiota disturbances caused by antibiotics or Clostridioides difficile infection. However, these treatments have typically been limited to restoring gut microbiota after dysbiosis, and antibiotics must be discontinued beforehand. Here, we investigated the protective effects of these treatments on gut microbiota to prevent dysbiosis during concurrent systemic ceftriaxone administration.

methodsC57BL/6 mice that received intraperitoneal ceftriaxone for seven consecutive days were concomitantly treated with AC, FMT, FMT + AC, FF, or FF + AC via oral gavage. Gut microbiomes were analyzed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing, and intestinal mucosal pathology was evaluated through H&E staining.

resultsSystemic ceftriaxone administration significantly altered gut microbiota diversity and composition but did not affect intestinal mucosal histology. Alpha and beta diversity analyses showed that microbiota diversity decreased in all ceftriaxone-treated groups, with the ceftriaxone + FF + AC group retaining the highest diversity. The ceftriaxone + AC group had higher Enterococcus but lower Muribaculaceae relative abundances than the control (no ceftriaxone), ceftriaxone only, and ceftriaxone + FF + AC groups.

conclusionsThese results show that fecal filtrate transplantation combined with activated charcoal treatment may help balance gut microbiota diversity and reduce the presence of resistant bacteria during ceftriaxone exposure.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCharcoalDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsIntestinal MucosaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneCharcoalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SActivated charcoalAntibioticsDysbiosisFecal filtrateFecal microbiota transplantationGut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID40263438
PMCPMC12015545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.