Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263436›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The shallowest transparent and interpretable deep neural network for image recognition.

Gurmail Singh, Stefano Frizzo Stefenon, Kin-Choong Yow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gurmail SinghDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. gurmail.singh@wisc.edu.
Stefano Frizzo StefenonFaculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada. stefano@uniplaclages.edu.br.
Kin-Choong YowFaculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada. kin-choong.yow@uregina.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DDG-2020-00034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trusting the decisions of deep learning models requires transparency of their reasoning process, especially for high-risk decisions. In this paper, a fully transparent deep learning model (Shallow-ProtoPNet) is introduced. This model consists of a transparent prototype layer, followed by an indispensable fully connected layer that connects prototypes and logits, whereas usually, interpretable models are not fully transparent because they use some black-box part as their baseline. This is the difference between Shallow-ProtoPNet and prototypical part network (ProtoPNet), the proposed Shallow-ProtoPNet does not use any black box part as a baseline, whereas ProtoPNet uses convolutional layers of black-box models as the baseline. On the dataset of X-ray images, the performance of the model is comparable to the other interpretable models that are not completely transparent. Since Shallow-ProtoPNet has only one (transparent) convolutional layer and a fully connected layer, it is the shallowest transparent deep neural network with only two layers between the input and output layers. Therefore, the size of our model is much smaller than that of its counterparts, making it suitable for use in embedded systems.

Indexed as

Deep learningImage classificationInterpretable modelsPrototypical part network

Identifiers

PMID40263436
PMCPMC12015224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.