Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263435›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2025

Age-related mesenchymal stromal cell senescence is associated with progression from MGUS to multiple myeloma.

Natalya Plakhova, Vasilios Panagopoulos, Melissa D Cantley, Laura J Trainor, Duncan R Hewett, Kimberley C Clark, Jo Gardiner, Angelina Yong, Cindy Lee, Noemi Horvath and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer Cell Dormancy in the Bone Microenvironment.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Natalya PlakhovaMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Vasilios PanagopoulosMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Melissa D CantleyMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Laura J TrainorMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2183-3963
Duncan R HewettMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Kimberley C ClarkMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6277-8297
Jo GardinerDepartment of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Angelina YongDepartment of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Cindy LeeDepartment of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Noemi HorvathDepartment of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter I CroucherGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7102-2413
Dimitrios CakourosPrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Sheila A StewartDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, ICCE Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Stan GronthosPrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andrew C W ZannettinoMyeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6646-6167
Krzysztof M Mrozik *Myeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Kate Vandyke *Myeloma Research Laboratory, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. kate.vandyke@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-849X

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AIMEE S JAMES · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
MICROENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS OF TUMOR DORMANCYR01AG059244 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEWART, SHEILA A · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
SENESCENT STROMA STIMULATES INFLAMMATION TO PROMOTE TUMORIGENESISR01CA217208 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEWART, SHEILA A · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Cancer Australia 2013025Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1160000Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP2009010NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217208NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059244U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) AG059244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to multiple myeloma (MM) increases with advancing age, suggesting that progression may be influenced by age-related changes within the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. We hypothesise that senescent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which accumulate in the BM with age, may contribute to MGUS progression to MM. Here, we show that, like BM MSCs from aged non-cancer controls, BM MSCs from both MM and MGUS patients exhibit a senescent phenotype characterised by enlarged, flattened morphology, increased β-galactosidase activity and CDKN2A expression, and decreased proliferation rate compared with BM MSCs from healthy young individuals. While coculture with BM MSCs suppresses the proliferative capacity of MM cell lines in vitro, induction of senescence via irradiation or replicative exhaustion in healthy MSCs relieves this suppression, compared with non-senescent MSCs. This may, in part, be attributable to upregulated expression of the BMP antagonist Gremlin1 in senescent MSCs, which facillitates MM cell proliferation. Notably, the risk of progression to MM was significantly elevated in MGUS patients with increased MSC senescence. Collectively, our data provide evidence that age-related accumulation of senescent MSCs may be a driver of MGUS to MM progression.

Indexed as

AgingCellular SenescenceMesenchymal Stem CellsMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40263435
PMCPMC12133572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.