Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Electrolyte disorders in the critically ill: a retrospective analysis.

Kaspar Felix Bachmann, Benjamin Hess, Merli Koitmäe, Andreas Bloch, Adrian Regli, Annika Reintam Blaser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaspar Felix BachmannDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland. kasparfelix.bachmann@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-6923
Benjamin HessDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Merli KoitmäeEstonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Andreas BlochDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Adrian RegliDepartment of Intensive Care, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Annika Reintam BlaserDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

Estonian Research Council Grant PRG1255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several electrolyte disorders have been associated with adverse outcomes, but data on the coincidence of multiple disorders, interactions between different electrolytes and the impact of substitution on electrolyte levels are scarce. This study aimed to describe electrolyte disorders' prevalence, incidence, and interaction in a consecutive cohort of ICU patients. Single-center retrospective study, including 2,056 consecutive adult ICU patients. Patients without laboratory data, those declining participation, and those receiving renal replacement therapy were excluded. Electrolyte levels and intravenous electrolyte administration were analyzed during the first 96 h after ICU admission using descriptive statistics, regression models and AUC-ROC analysis. Of 2392 admitted patients, 2056 were included. On admission, 312 patients (15.2%) had no electrolytes measured, 316 (15.4%) did not have any electrolyte disorder, 643 (31.3%) had one disorder, and 785 (38.2%) had multiple disorders. The most common electrolyte disorders on admission were hyperchloremia (56.0%, 977/1,744), hyperkalemia (18.7%, 326/1,744), hypophosphatemia (16.8%, 293/1,744), and hyperphosphatemia (16.4%, 286/1,744). Most patients (77.4%, 1,592/2,056) developed at least one new disorder during their ICU stay. A considerable number of patients (19.7%, 344/1,744) experienced electrolyte disorders in both directions ('hypo' and 'hyper') during their ICU stay. Linear regression models revealed that changes in one electrolyte level are often associated with alterations in other electrolyte levels. Most patients (99.2% 2,039/2,056) received intravenous electrolytes. Electrolyte overcorrection occurred in 89/365 patients (24.4%) for hypokalemia and 50/575 patients (8.7%) for hypophosphatemia. AUC-ROC analysis revealed cut-off points with the highest sensitivity and specificity at 30 mmol of potassium within 6 h and 45 mmol of phosphate within 15 h. Electrolyte disorders are highly prevalent in ICU patients, with significant co-incidence and interplay between these disorders. Knowledge regarding overcorrection risks may inform safe electrolyte administration protocols.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceAdultAgedElectrolytesFemaleHumansHypophosphatemiaIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesElectrolytesCritical illnessElectrolyte disorderElectrolyte imbalanceElectrolyte substitutionIntensive care units

Identifiers

PMID40263430
PMCPMC12015444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.