ArticleScientific reports2025
Electrolyte disorders in the critically ill: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-based radiological score (AMESI CT-score) for severity of bowel injury in acute mesenteric ischemia.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Article
- Agreement of Electrolyte Measurements Between Arterial Blood Gas Analyzers and Central Laboratories in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Association between electrolyte disturbance score and 30-day severe disturbance of consciousness and in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: A retrospective observational cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Admission Electrolyte Abnormalities and Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Association Between Hyperchloremia and Neurological Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of hyperkalemia of the Austrian Society of Nephrology 2026].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Electrolyte disturbances after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors: incidence and severity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several electrolyte disorders have been associated with adverse outcomes, but data on the coincidence of multiple disorders, interactions between different electrolytes and the impact of substitution on electrolyte levels are scarce. This study aimed to describe electrolyte disorders' prevalence, incidence, and interaction in a consecutive cohort of ICU patients. Single-center retrospective study, including 2,056 consecutive adult ICU patients. Patients without laboratory data, those declining participation, and those receiving renal replacement therapy were excluded. Electrolyte levels and intravenous electrolyte administration were analyzed during the first 96 h after ICU admission using descriptive statistics, regression models and AUC-ROC analysis. Of 2392 admitted patients, 2056 were included. On admission, 312 patients (15.2%) had no electrolytes measured, 316 (15.4%) did not have any electrolyte disorder, 643 (31.3%) had one disorder, and 785 (38.2%) had multiple disorders. The most common electrolyte disorders on admission were hyperchloremia (56.0%, 977/1,744), hyperkalemia (18.7%, 326/1,744), hypophosphatemia (16.8%, 293/1,744), and hyperphosphatemia (16.4%, 286/1,744). Most patients (77.4%, 1,592/2,056) developed at least one new disorder during their ICU stay. A considerable number of patients (19.7%, 344/1,744) experienced electrolyte disorders in both directions ('hypo' and 'hyper') during their ICU stay. Linear regression models revealed that changes in one electrolyte level are often associated with alterations in other electrolyte levels. Most patients (99.2% 2,039/2,056) received intravenous electrolytes. Electrolyte overcorrection occurred in 89/365 patients (24.4%) for hypokalemia and 50/575 patients (8.7%) for hypophosphatemia. AUC-ROC analysis revealed cut-off points with the highest sensitivity and specificity at 30 mmol of potassium within 6 h and 45 mmol of phosphate within 15 h. Electrolyte disorders are highly prevalent in ICU patients, with significant co-incidence and interplay between these disorders. Knowledge regarding overcorrection risks may inform safe electrolyte administration protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.