ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of primary entry tear locations on outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Intimal Tear Location on Clinical Outcomes in Extensive Arch Repair of Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have explored the impact of different primary entry tear sites in acute type A aortic dissection. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the primary entry tear location on presentation, treatment, and outcome in this condition. We retrospectively reviewed acute type A aortic dissection repair surgical records at our institution (2004 and 2020) (n = 213). The patients were classified into the ascending aorta entry (As-E), aortic arch entry (Ar-E), and descending thoracic aorta or downstream entry (Dd-E) groups. The As-E group was the oldest (P < 0.01) and included the fewest males (P < 0.01). Pre-operative neurological complication rates were highest in As-E, 16%; Ar-E, 5%; and Dd-E, 0% (P = 0.03). Malperfusion syndrome rates were as follows: As-E, 10%; Ar-E, 2%; and Dd-E, 0% (P = 0.05). As-E was associated with the highest in-hospital mortality (As-E, 13%; Ar-E, 8%; Dd-E, 0%; P = 0.27). In-hospital mortality risk factors included pre-operative neurological complications, malperfusion syndrome, and concomitant procedures. Subanalysis revealed that ascending aortic entry was an independent risk factor for pre-operative acute neurological complications. The primary entry site may indirectly affect outcomes, by mediating the risks of pre-operative complications, which are linked to mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.