Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40263410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Three-dimensional bioprinted in vitro glioma tumor constructs for synchrotron microbeam radiotherapy dosimetry and biological study using gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel.

John Paul O Bustillo, Elette E M Engels, Vincent de Rover, Kiarn Roughley, Julia Rebecca D Posadas, Elrick T Inocencio, Danielle Warren, Gordon G Wallace, Moeava Tehei, Anatoly B Rosenfeld and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John Paul O BustilloCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia. jbustillo@uow.edu.au.
Elette E M EngelsCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Vincent de RoverCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Kiarn RoughleyCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Julia Rebecca D PosadasDepartment of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Manila, Ermita, Manila City, Metro Manila, 1000, Philippines.
Elrick T InocencioDepartment of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Manila, Ermita, Manila City, Metro Manila, 1000, Philippines.
Danielle WarrenAIIM Facility, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Gordon G WallaceAIIM Facility, Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Moeava TeheiCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Anatoly B RosenfeldCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Michael L F LerchCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong Australia, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synchrotron microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is an innovative cancer treatment that uses micron-sized of ultra-high dose rate spatially fractionated X-rays to effectively control cancer growth while reducing the damage to surrounding healthy tissue. However, the current pre-clinical experiments are commonly limited with the use of conventional two-dimensional cell cultures which cannot accurately model in vivo tissue environment. This study aims to propose a three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel protocol and to characterize 3D bioprinted glioma relative to cell monolayer and spheroid models for experimental MRT using 9L rat gliosarcoma and U87 human glioma. Synchrotron broad-beam (SBB) and MRT beams were delivered to all cell models using 5, 10, and 20 Gy. 3D bioprinting enables the creation of 3D cell models that mimic in vivo conditions using bioinks, biomaterials, and cells. Synchrotron dosimetry, Monte Carlo simulation, in vitro cell viability, and fluorescence microscopy were performed to understand the relationship of the radiation dosimetry with the radiobiological response of different cancer models. Encapsulated gliomas were placed inside 3D printed human and rat phantoms to mimic scattering conditions. Results showed that MRT kills more gliomas relative to SBB for all cell models. The 3D bioprinted culture detected the spatial clustering of dead cells due to MRT high peak doses as seen in fluorescence imaging. The result of this study progresses MRT research by integrating 3D bioprinting techniques in radiobiological experiments. The study's bioprinting protocol and results will help in reducing the use of animal experiments and possibly in clinical translation of MRT.

Indexed as

BioprintingBrain NeoplasmsGelatinGliomaHydrogelsMethacrylatesPrinting, Three-DimensionalAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansRadiometryRatsSynchrotronsGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylates3D PrintingBiofabricationBioprintingBrain CancerGelMAGliomaMicrobeam Radiation TherapySpatial fractionationSynchrotron Radiation

Identifiers

PMID40263410
PMCPMC12015499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.