ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical study of computerized tomography angiography and computerized tomography perfusion in severe traumatic brain injury by a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a significant public health concern with high disability and mortality rates. No reliable diagnostic tools exist to determine surgical indications or predict prognosis. To assess the clinical value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and perfusion (CTP) in sTBI, and compare treatment efficacy based on traditional imaging versus CTA/CTP assessment. This retrospective study included 169 patients with sTBI who underwent CTA/CTP at admission and postoperatively to guide treatment decisions. Another 132 patients received treatment based on traditional imaging. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Although the 6-month Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) scores were comparable, in-hospital mortality was lower in the CTA/CTP group, and the craniotomy rate was significantly reduced. A higher proportion of patients who underwent the operation in the CTA/CTP group had favorable prognoses. Moreover, the hospitalization duration and costs were substantially lower in the CTA/CTP group. The CTA/CTP imaging provides critical cerebrovascular and perfusion data in sTBI, aiding in surgical decision-making and perioperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.