Observational studyScientific reports2025
Evaluation of a near infrared spectroscopy based method for the estimation of substance P in saliva of patients with COPD.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying noninvasive specific disease biomarkers that can provide valuable information about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) progression, potential complications, or treatment response is of paramount importance. In this study, we propose the validation of an innovative near-infrared (NIR) device that utilizes near-infrared light reflectance techniques combined with data validation through a convolutional neural network for the detection of substance P in non-invasive saliva samples. We conducted an analytical observational cross-sectional study at a leading university hospital between January and March 2022, including patients with COPD and controls without the disease. Following the collection of clinical data, a saliva sample was obtained for the determination of substance P which was analyzed both by the NIR device and an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Direct comparisons were made, and Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess the level of agreement between the two measurements. The sample consisted of 102 subjects, 44 with COPD and 58 controls. The average differences between the two measurement methods yielded similar results with no significant differences between them, showing a value of 110.2 (16.1) pg/ml for the NIR device and 110.5 (16.7) pg/ml for the ELISA determination (p > 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots show a small difference and a level of agreement consistent with good measurement by the NIR device. The results of this study validate the efficacy of a NIR device combined with a convolutional neural network for detecting substance P in the saliva of COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.